AI meeting notes

Best for AI meeting notes

Explore Fathom for personal meeting records, Fireflies for shared transcripts and CRM follow-up, and Otter for meeting capture. Compare transcription, exports and plan allowances separately.

Updated

Based on competitors’ published descriptions; no hands-on testing.

Researched separately by GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5.

Reference meetings: English-language calls on Zoom or Google Meet, lasting 45 minutes each; 20 a month for an individual or 40 for a team.

At a glance

View sources ↓

Otter

For people who want to organize records from Zoom, Google Meet or Teams meetings, consider Otter. Fireflies describes Otter's meeting capture and lists a HubSpot integration. Those are starting points for checking your recording and follow-up workflow. An integration listing does not confirm the write action you need. Check a full 45-minute transcript, summary, text export and the monthly allowance.

Source 1 · Link to recommendation ↗

Fireflies

For small teams exploring live transcription, shared records and meeting-note sync to a CRM, consider Fireflies. Otter's comparison describes live transcription, shared summaries and comments, plus syncing notes to HubSpot activity feeds. Confirm the plan required for HubSpot. In a trial, check that notes reach the right contact without duplicates, and check credits for action items and advanced summaries.

Source 2 · Link to recommendation ↗

Fathom

For individuals who mainly meet on Zoom, Google Meet or Teams and want to revisit their calls, consider Fathom. Fireflies describes Fathom's recording, transcription and summaries, with action items and follow-up email drafts on paid plans. Check text export and the summary types you need. For HubSpot follow-up, test an actual write rather than relying on the integration name.

Source 3 · Link to recommendation ↗

Sources